My Sanford Chart allows you secure online access to your personal health information and your child's health information. It's available anywhere you have internet access. There is no cost to you and registering is quick and simple.
It is standard practice for doctors to use a low, side-to-side (transverse) incision across the uterus for a cesarean delivery. But a vertical type of incision is sometimes needed, such as for some emergency cesarean deliveries.
Before deciding whether you are a good candidate for a safe vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), you and your doctor must first confirm what kind of uterine incision you have had. Because the outward scar is not always positioned over the uterine scar, checking your medical record is the only dependable way to be sure of your incision type.
A low transverse (horizontal) incision:
A vertical (classical) incision:
Women who have a low transverse cesarean scar have a lower risk of rupturing than women who have a vertical incision. About 5 to 9 out of 1,000 women (0.5% to 0.9%) with a low transverse scar have a uterine rupture during a trial of labor.1 (It is likely that the women who rupture have other risk factors that make them more vulnerable to this complication.)
Women who have a low vertical cesarean scar (which is only on the lower uterus) are as likely to deliver vaginally as they would be with a low transverse scar. And they have no higher risk of complications, including rupture.1 Some doctors are willing to allow a woman with a very low vertical incision to try VBAC, but most doctors are not. This is because of the concern about uterine rupture.
A woman with a vertical (classical) incision has the greatest uterine rupture risk. About 40 to 90 out of 1,000 women (4% to 9%) with this type of vertical incision scar have a uterine rupture during a trial of labor.2
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2010). Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 115. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 116(2): 450–463.
- Cunningham FG, et al. (2010). Prior cesarean delivery. In Williams Obstetrics, 23rd ed., pp. 565–576. New York: McGraw-Hill.
|Primary Medical Reviewer||Sarah Marshall, MD - Family Medicine|
|Specialist Medical Reviewer||Femi Olatunbosun, MB, FRCSC - Obstetrics and Gynecology|
|Last Revised||March 29, 2013|
Last Revised: March 29, 2013
Author: Healthwise Staff
To learn more visit Healthwise.org
© 1995-2013 Healthwise, Incorporated. Healthwise, Healthwise for every health decision, and the Healthwise logo are trademarks of Healthwise, Incorporated.